Wednesday , 13 December 2017
Breaking News

HC stays recovery proceedings against real estate developer

Image result for Real EstateThe Delhi High Court has stayed the recovery proceedings against a real estate developer over alleged failure to repay a loan amount of over Rs three crore to a company which had lent the money.

Justice Jayant Nath also appointed a retired district and sessions judge as an arbitrator to adjudicate the dispute between the parties.

The court said the arbitrator will function under the aegis of the Delhi International Arbitration Centre (DIAC).

“The ‘sarfaesi’ (recovery) proceedings shall remain stayed for the duration of the arbitration proceeding,” it said.

The court said the director of M/S Proto Developers and Technologies Ltd, the real estate developer, will pay a sum of Rs 50 lakh in three monthly instalments to the lender, Dewan Housing Finance Corporation Ltd (DHFL).

Recovery proceedings allows banks and other financial institutions to auction residential or commercial properties to recover loans.

The court’s order came on DHFL’s plea, which had sought setting aside of the arbitrator’s January 29 order staying the proceedings against the real state developer.

DHFL, a housing finance company, has claimed that under the arbitration clause in the loan agreement, the arbitrator was to be appointed by them.

The firm without following the procedure as mentioned in the loan agreement, signed between the parties, had appointed the arbitrator in an erroneous and misconceived manner, DHFL’s counsel had contended in the petition.

Advocates Pankaj Garg and Milind Garg, appearing for the real estate developer, had submitted that DHFL was needlessly adding unnecessary charges and not giving them any of the details.

“A housing loan of Rs 3.75 crore was availed by the firm in 2007 and till 2016, Rs 4.40 crore was paid to DHFL,” the counsel had said, adding that DHFL has charged approximately 19 per cent rate of interest per annum instead of 8.75 per cent as per the guidelines of the Reserve Bank of India (RBI).

The firm’s counsel had contended that the admitted amount of loan in terms of the interest rate as per the RBI was Rs 50 lakhs only against the demand of DHFL of approximately Rs three crore.

The high court has referred the matter to the DIAC for adjudication of all disputes between parties.

As per DHFL, it had in September 2007 had granted financial assistance to the real state developer enabling it to purchase two flats at Greater Kailash in south Delhi.

It said that after the firm had failed to repay the loan, they approached the trial court seeking to appoint a receiver to take possession of the property, which was allowed.

However, the arbitrator appointed by the firm had stayed the recovery proceedings.

(This article has not been edited by DNA’s editorial team and is auto-generated from an agency feed.)

[“Source-ndtv”]