• Home
  • Contact Us !
  • Privacy Policy
Snipblog
  • Home
  • News
  • Mobile
  • Internet News
  • Social Media
  • Real Estate
  • Gadgets
  • Education
  • Technology
  • Finance
  • Car 2K17-2K18
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • News
  • Mobile
  • Internet News
  • Social Media
  • Real Estate
  • Gadgets
  • Education
  • Technology
  • Finance
  • Car 2K17-2K18
No Result
View All Result
Snipblog
No Result
View All Result
Home Internet News

Is the internet ultimately a force for good or evil?

Loknath Das by Loknath Das
November 7, 2017
in Internet News
0
0
SHARES
1
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

Rose McGowan in Detroit. ‘The main benefit of the internet has been social connectivity: uniting marginalized groups in ways that give them a seat at the table.’

I mostly hate the internet. But the outrage and debate that has arisen in the wake of the Weinstein allegations couldn’t have happened without it. That has to be a good thing, right?

Hey. I mostly hate the internet, too. And until this business with Weinstein, I have mostly hated the internet for the way in which it enables certain kinds of debate. Some extraordinary benefits are coming out of the Weinstein revelations, mostly obviously the sense of collective strength derived from the testimony of so many women. But in terms of the systems via which it has emerged, I’m not sure this scandal entirely changes the game.

Let’s try to break it down. It is generally agreed that, apart from negating the need to ever leave one’s house, the main benefit of the internet has been social connectivity: specifically, uniting special and marginalized interest groups in ways that amplifies their voices and gives them a seat at the table. Such is the situation with Weinstein.

The power of women’s voices has be overwhelmingly, gratifyingly raised these past weeks, as women of all ages and demographics feel emboldened to step forward to share their stories of sexual harassment. For what feels like the first time in history, the sheer bloody numbers – teetering towards the universal – have been viscerally felt. It’s like a miraculous release after decades, centuries, millennia of bullshit.

Of course, “special and marginalized interest groups” also include people whose special interests don’t align with one’s own. The Ku Klux Klan is a special interest group, as are dungeon-dwelling trolls. The internet is not a subtle instrument. It promotes broad strokes over nuanced ones. It rewards outrage. In the case of Weinstein and his ilk, social media is a way of leveling the playing field between men of immense wealth and power, and the rest of us, and in this instance, the outrage is warranted. But it might be worth considering the mechanisms via which that outrage is expressed, and understand that if those mechanisms are being strengthened, there are potentially negative as well as positive implications.

I’m talking about “public shaming”, whereby individual transgressors are rounded on by potentially huge numbers of people online, in some cases on the basis of scant evidence, and for recreational as well as legitimate reasons. The dissemination of spreadsheets aggregating unsubstantiated allegations against scores of men – which inevitably get leaked – is strongly cathartic given the total lack of interest most institutions have shown over the years in rooting out sexual harassers. But it is not a foundation on which to base policy change.

Obviously, changing perception is a necessary precursor to changing policy; just look at the history of gay rights legislation. And I don’t hold with the idea that highlighting “trivial” acts of sexism undermines those at the “serious” end. It is all part of a continuum undergirded by the same, misogynistic presumptions.

It’s great to see women, and men, speaking out against alleged harassers. But is ‘lived experience’ shutting others out of the debate?
FacebookTwitterPinterest
 It’s great to see women, and men, speaking out against alleged harassers. But is ‘lived experience’ shutting others out of the debate? Photograph: Murdo Macleod for the Guardian

What makes me nervous is the unvarying pitch in which some of these things are discussed; the appetite for vengeance is one I understand well, but to indulge it doesn’t usually end well. It seems to me un-ideal to put forces into effect whereby the “punishment” – exposure online, to potentially huge audiences – makes no distinction between a serial rapist and a guy who asks a woman out one time too many. It is right that both of these things should be considered wrong, and tackled, but to make no distinction in how that happens is absurd.

There is something else I can’t quite put my finger on and that is the promotion of “lived experience” over all other considerations. Historically, victims of sexual assault have been made only to feel shame, and it is a blessed relief to see women, and men, come forward to reclaim the status with something like pride. I suppose my concern is that when personal experience becomes the only, or at least the main source of authority for those participating in any given debate, it narrows the issue, potentially shutting out those who might otherwise join in and creating a strangely insular climate. In this instance, this is probably vastly outweighed by the benefits of people speaking out. But it is something to be aware of.

If we hold it to be true that social media, and the idea of public shaming, is a dangerous dynamic that cuts both ways, the more we should hesitate to use it. You could say that in the Weinstein case, all that is happening is that the power of social media is finally being harnessed to a just cause, rather than directed at someone who threw a V-sign in front of a war grave or made a bad joke that didn’t land well on Twitter.

But this isn’t adequate. If the mechanism itself is faulty, then we should surely retain some scintilla of scepticism about it, irrespective of the cause it promotes. Given inadequacies in the criminal justice system; given the hopelessness of institutions (and individual men) to self-regulate, and given the way in which sexual harassment has never been taken remotely seriously by those with the power to stop it, then, yes, I think what’s going on right now can only be a good thing.

But we have to be conscious of what we are strengthening when we use these dynamics as a bypass, or supplement, to the official mechanisms of justice. They are very blunt, and they are very, very hard to control.

Source:-the guardian

Tags: aevil?forforceGoodInternetisortheultimately
Previous Post

Maybe Don’t Go On the Internet Today or Even This Week

Next Post

3 “Internet of Things” Stocks to Buy Now

Loknath Das

Loknath Das

Next Post
3 “Internet of Things” Stocks to Buy Now

3 "Internet of Things" Stocks to Buy Now

  • Trending
  • Comments
  • Latest
The 3 Main Types of Scaffolding and What They are used for

The 3 Main Types of Scaffolding and What They are used for

December 18, 2016
Microsoft’s OneNote Can Now Help With Your Maths Homework

Microsoft’s OneNote Can Now Help With Your Maths Homework

September 3, 2016
A Brief History of Mayo Stands and Other Tools and Equipment

A Brief History of Mayo Stands and Other Tools and Equipment

October 25, 2016
Modest Fashion 2023: A Comprehensive Guide

Modest Fashion 2023: A Comprehensive Guide

May 26, 2023
Asus ZenFone 2 Variant With 4GB RAM, 16GB Inbuilt Storage Launched

Asus ZenFone 2 Variant With 4GB RAM, 16GB Inbuilt Storage Launched

0
Optical Fibre Laid in 68,000 Village Panchayats: Telecom Minister

Optical Fibre Laid in 68,000 Village Panchayats: Telecom Minister

0
iPhone 6s Sports 1.8GHz Dual-Core Apple A9 SoC in Certification Listing

iPhone 6s Sports 1.8GHz Dual-Core Apple A9 SoC in Certification Listing

0
Microsoft Targeting SMBs in Punjab, Haryana for Cloud Services

Microsoft Targeting SMBs in Punjab, Haryana for Cloud Services

0
How to Become Topper: 10 Easy Yet Practical Strategies

How to Become Topper: 10 Easy Yet Practical Strategies

May 30, 2025
You Could Use Some of Your Equity To Give Your Children the Gift of Home

You Could Use Some of Your Equity To Give Your Children the Gift of Home

May 20, 2025
Navigating Technological Challenges: How Redapt Can Drive Your Success

Navigating Technological Challenges: How Redapt Can Drive Your Success

May 10, 2025
7 benefits of mobile apps for businesses

7 benefits of mobile apps for businesses

May 5, 2025

Recent News

How to Become Topper: 10 Easy Yet Practical Strategies

How to Become Topper: 10 Easy Yet Practical Strategies

May 30, 2025
You Could Use Some of Your Equity To Give Your Children the Gift of Home

You Could Use Some of Your Equity To Give Your Children the Gift of Home

May 20, 2025
Navigating Technological Challenges: How Redapt Can Drive Your Success

Navigating Technological Challenges: How Redapt Can Drive Your Success

May 10, 2025
7 benefits of mobile apps for businesses

7 benefits of mobile apps for businesses

May 5, 2025
  • Home
  • Contact Us !
  • Privacy & Policy

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • News
  • Mobile
  • Internet News
  • Social Media
  • Real Estate
  • Gadgets
  • Education
  • Technology
  • Finance
  • Car 2K17-2K18